From alb@sct.gouv.qc.ca  Tue Jul 30 01:02:53 1996
Received: from socrate.riq.qc.ca (socrate.riq.qc.ca [199.84.128.1]) by dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id BAA15609 for <sc18wg9@dkuug.dk>; Tue, 30 Jul 1996 01:02:51 +0200
Received: from riq2592 (riq-128-34.riq.qc.ca) by socrate.riq.qc.ca (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA19942; Mon, 29 Jul 1996 19:05:03 -0400
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 1996 19:05:02 -0400
Message-Id: <9607292305.AA19942@socrate.riq.qc.ca>
X-Sender: alb@riq.qc.ca
X-Mailer: Eudora Light pour Windows Version 1.5.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: shl@hogpa.ho.att.com (Steven H Lewis), MARISA TOPPING <MTOPPING@ansi.org>
From: "Alain LaBont/e'/" <alb@sct.gouv.qc.ca>
Subject: Re: (SC18WG9.9) Amendment 1 to ISO/IEC 9995-7
Cc: brannon@isocs.iso.ch (Keith B.), sc18wg9@dkuug.dk

At 17:37 1996-7-29 EDT, Steven H Lewis wrote:
>Much of what comes across this list is of general interest and thus 
>appropriate to a reflector, but some is not.  Alain, if what you 
>want is to make sure the WG9 and SC18 secretariats get a copy of 
>your RTF files, why not send them just to them?
>
>(just a grumpy grey monday here)

Sorry about that. I thought members, like you btw (you were not in
Hamamatsu), would like to have a copy too. 

Alain