From listadm Fri Sep 27 00:30:57 2002 Received: from relay2.nima.mil (relay2.nima.mil [164.214.4.52]) by dkuug.dk (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id AAA51408 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 00:30:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from MooreLA@nima.mil) Received: by relay2.nima.mil; id SAA14883; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 18:30:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from crusher.nima.mil(164.214.16.12) by relay2.nima.mil via smap (V5.5) id xma014789; Thu, 26 Sep 02 18:29:53 -0400 Received: by smtpgate.nima.mil with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 18:29:52 -0400 Message-ID: <0C4D238598729A408908411FAD90FB78770633@stlclu01.gold.rtgold.nima.mil> From: "Moore, Laura A. " To: "'Jean Stride - for attachments'" , "'sc24@dkuug.dk'" Subject: FW: Systematic reviews of SC 24 standards Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 18:29:41 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C265AC.34C9DCE0" This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C265AC.34C9DCE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" The US has active use of ISO/IEC 9637-2 and would like to see the standard reaffirmed. Laura Moore Laura Moore, Chair ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC24 for Image Processing National Imagery and Mapping Agency PST L-66 3838 Vogel Rd. ARNOLD MO 63010-6238 USA Voice: 1-314-263-4567 Fax: 1-314-263-4381 moorela@nima.mil -----Original Message----- From: Protzman, William [mailto:wprotzman@dcscorp.com] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:03 AM To: Moore, Laura A. Subject: RE: Systematic reviews of SC 24 standards Laura, I would like to see 9637-2 reaffirmed if possible. Bill -----Original Message----- From: Moore, Laura A. [mailto:MooreLA@nima.mil] Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 11:46 PM To: Protzman, William; 'Don Singley' Subject: FW: Systematic reviews of SC 24 standards asking you also -----Original Message----- From: Jean Stride [mailto:Jean.Stride@bsi-global.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 9:40 AM To: puk@igraphics.com; greg.mcbroome@lmco.com; MooreLA@nima.mil Cc: Trinh Chau Subject: Systematic reviews of SC 24 standards Hello I have just had the results of the systematic review of our standards. Whilst all the standards received a majority vote for confirmation, the standards listed below were proposed for withdrawal by France, Germany and Japan. Do you have any thoughts on whether we should consider withdrawal of these documents??? ISO/IEC 12089 : Encoding for Imaging Interchange Facility (IIF) ISO/IEC 9637-2 CGI : Binary Encoding Thanks Jean ********************************************************************** Visit the BSI website at www.bsi-global.com This email may contain confidential information and/or copyright material. This email is intended for the use of the addressee only. Any unauthorised use may be unlawful. If you receive this email by mistake, please advise the sender immediately by using the reply facility in your email software. Thank you for your cooperation ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all known viruses. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C265AC.34C9DCE0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"

The US has active use of ISO/IEC 9637-2 and would like to see the

standard reaffirmed.

Laura Moore

Laura Moore, Chair ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC24 for Image Processing
National Imagery and Mapping Agency
PST L-66
3838 Vogel Rd.
ARNOLD MO 63010-6238 USA
Voice: 1-314-263-4567
Fax: 1-314-263-4381
moorela@nima.mil

-----Original Message-----
From: Protzman, William [mailto:wprotzman@dcscorp.com]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:03 AM
To: Moore, Laura A.
Subject: RE: Systematic reviews of SC 24 standards

Laura,

I would like to see 9637-2 reaffirmed if possible.

Bill

-----Original Message-----
From: Moore, Laura A. [mailto:MooreLA@nima.mil]
Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 11:46 PM
To: Protzman, William; 'Don Singley'
Subject: FW: Systematic reviews of SC 24 standards

asking you also

-----Original Message-----
From: Jean Stride [mailto:Jean.Stride@bsi-global.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 9:40 AM
To: puk@igraphics.com; greg.mcbroome@lmco.com; MooreLA@nima.mil
Cc: Trinh Chau
Subject: Systematic reviews of SC 24 standards

Hello

I have just had the results of the systematic review of our standards.

Whilst all the standards received a majority vote for confirmation, the standards listed below were proposed for withdrawal by France, Germany and Japan. Do you have any thoughts on whether we should

consider withdrawal of these documents???

ISO/IEC 12089 : Encoding for Imaging Interchange Facility (IIF)

ISO/IEC 9637-2 CGI : Binary Encoding

Thanks

Jean
********************************************************************** Visit the BSI website at www.bsi-global.com This email may contain confidential information and/or copyright material. This email is intended for the use of the addressee only. Any unauthorised use may be unlawful. If you receive this email by mistake, please advise the sender immediately by using the reply facility in your email software. Thank you for your cooperation
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all known viruses.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C265AC.34C9DCE0--