From puk@multi10.netcomi.com Wed Jan 28 18:59:11 1998 Received: from multi10.netcomi.com (puk@multi10.netcomi.com [204.58.155.210]) by dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id SAA17439 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 1998 18:59:09 +0100 Received: (from puk@localhost) by multi10.netcomi.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) id LAA05269; Wed, 28 Jan 1998 11:58:48 -0600 Received: from dkuug.dk (dkuug.dk [193.88.44.89]) by multi10.netcomi.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA05261 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 1998 11:58:45 -0600 Received: (from daemon@localhost) by dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) id SAA16938 for SC24-list; Wed, 28 Jan 1998 18:40:16 +0100 Message-Id: <199801281740.SAA16938@dkuug.dk> Reply-To: "Richard Puk" From: "Richard Puk" X-Sequence: SC24@dkuug.dk 375 Errors-To: SC24-request@dkuug.dk Old-To: "Jean Stride" <100434.3031@compuserve.com> Cc: "Steve Carson" , "ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 24" Subject: (SC24.375) SC24 Plenary Date: Wed, 28 Jan 1998 09:39:08 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.3 X-Loop: forwarded by puk@igraphics.com To: puk@rbc.dec.com Hi, Jean -- Orlando after SIGGRAPH is OK with me. It looks like only two or three days will be needed unless more work shows up. There may be more work emanating from the VRML Consortium but I really won't know until after the VRML 98 Conference next month. I'll keep you posted. -- Dick -------------------------------------------------------------------- Richard F. Puk Intelligraphics Incorporated 7644 Cortina Court, Carlsbad, California 92009-8206 USA Tel: +1-760-753-9027 Fax: +1-760-753-9027 E-Mail: puk@igraphics.com -------------------------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: Jean Stride <100434.3031@compuserve.com> To: puk@rbc.dec.com Cc: Steve Carson ; ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 24 Date: Wednesday, January 28, 1998 2:31 AM Subject: (SC24.362) SC24 Plenary >Hello, > >Just so that you are aware I am on vacation from 24 May 1998 - 11 June >1998. >I would much rather we held a short meeting, after SIGGRAPH, in the Orlando >area. >>From a secretariat point of view this is how things currently stand: > >IMAGING >As BIIF will be complete by then, there is no current work for WG 7, nor >any "formal" proposals >being put before SC 24 at the present. (NPs may come from the February >meeting) > >PNG >Having spoken to one of the PNG editors, we expect to launch the PNG FCD >in April, so it > will still be under ballot in July, so "formally" we can not edit/act on >it at that time. (We could however >start preparing it in "ISO" format earlier). The current time for FCD >ballot is 6 months, although the draft >JTC 1 directives propose 4m14days will become the norm (but this is not yet >approved). >There will need to be some kind of editing meeting in the Autumn. > >GKS/PHIGS/CGM - no real business, just some editing work > >IGBT - No firm work at present > >I think the major task of any SC 24 meeting will be to rethink our future >- we need to start some >concrete work if we are to continue as any knid of seperate entity > >Jean > >