From udaa000@hazel.cc.kcl.ac.uk Thu Oct 26 18:15:42 1995 Received: from ns.dknet.dk (root@ns.dknet.dk [193.88.44.42]) by dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id SAA06410 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 1995 18:15:37 +0100 Received: from hazel.cc.kcl.ac.uk (hazel.cc.kcl.ac.uk [137.73.22.1]) by ns.dknet.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id PAA19605 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 1995 15:16:42 +0100 Received: by hazel.cc.kcl.ac.uk (MX V4.1 VAX) id 15; Thu, 26 Oct 1995 14:11:55 GMT Date: Thu, 26 Oct 1995 14:11:52 GMT From: Brian Meek To: sc22@dkuug.dk CC: udaa000@hazel.cc.kcl.ac.uk Message-ID: <00998735.76962C20.15@hazel.cc.kcl.ac.uk> Subject: Comments on draft WWW page templates I can't recall seeing any responses to the draft template for SC22 WG home pages, in Annapolis AN-8 and later sent electronically. Here are a few comments from me. Home page: In my expereince it's easy to make home pages too complicated and I think the draft errs slightly in that direction. On the whole it's better to start with a simple one and add to it if necessary rather than start with a big one, because if you then reorganise it regular viewers get upset! I'd suggest something like this after the header Scope and purpose - as suggested, fine. Convenor, with full contact info including mailto: link unless the convenor would rather it wasn't. Link to a page with a list of national contacts and liaisons. (NB there is no formal NB membership of WGs though delegates are expected to know that NB opinion is instead of or as well as representing themselves.) Include names and contact info for each, provided of course they agree. List of projects: IS, DIS, CD, WD, NP-with-no-WD-yet, TR, DTR, WDTR with links to pages for each (if they exist). Put ISO publication numbers but not old-style JTC1 project numbers as suggested in the draft - distracting and possibly offputting at home page level, but ISO numbers are important references. Link to document list page Link to page with next meeting info (date and place could be on home page if you want) Link to page with last meeting minutes. That's all. As for documents in main list, please not N1 to N12345 as a monolithic numerical list - or if you do, put them in reverse numerical order so the most recent ones are at the front. Alternatively and probably easier, put them in batches, again with most recent at top, e.g. links to - most recent (N601-) - (N501-600) - (N401-500) - (N301-400) - (N201-300) - (N101-200) - (N001-100) Brian Meek