From alb@riq.qc.ca  Sat Sep 27 17:12:22 1997
Received: from riq.qc.ca (socrate.riq.qc.ca [199.84.128.1]) by dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA19678; Sat, 27 Sep 1997 17:12:20 +0200
Received: from Annie.ULAVAL.CA (staa008.ulaval.ca [132.203.55.28])
	by riq.qc.ca (1.1/8.8.6) with SMTP id LAA04307;
	Sat, 27 Sep 1997 11:06:06 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.19970927110648.007efc80@riq.qc.ca>
X-Sender: alb@riq.qc.ca
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (32) [F]
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 1997 11:06:48 -0400
To: Markus Kuhn <mskuhn@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
From: Alain LaBonté - SCT <alb@riq.qc.ca>
Subject: Re: ISO 9995 terminology - Erratum
Cc: unicode@unicode.org, tc304@dkuug.dk, sc18wg9@dkuug.dk, sc22wg20@dkuug.dk,
        sc2@dkuug.dk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

I just wrote :

  "Level 2 select" keys are the traditional "Shift" keys, although the 
  term "select" is deprecated as there is no longer any physical shift of 
  a mechanism (and there is also a problem in other languages as well, 
  and a problem with the "other shift", the "level 3 shift").

It is the term "shift" which is deprecated, not the term "select", sorry
about this mistake.

Alain LaBonté
Québec