From keld@dkuug.dk Sat Dec 29 15:30:16 1990
Received: by dkuug.dk (5.64+/8+bit/IDA-1.2.8)
	id AA23170; Sat, 29 Dec 90 15:30:16 +0100
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 90 15:30:16 +0100
From: Keld J|rn Simonsen <keld@dkuug.dk>
Message-Id: <9012291430.AA23170@dkuug.dk>
To: i18n@dkuug.dk
Subject: posix i18n
X-Charset: ASCII
X-Char-Esc: 29


Greger proposed a strawman response to IEEE D10 ballots, dividing
i18n support in 3 levels. He asked for comments, and I posted a quick
personal one then. 

I have now gotten confirmed from Danish Standards (DS) that DS official
position for a long time has been that the i18n functionalty of D10
is mandatory for our acceptance of 9945-2 as an international standard.
DS sees no reason to change this position, which also is in line
with WG15 and WG15 RIN resolutions on the subject.

Keld Simonsen