From is@dakota-76.Eng.Sun.COM  Mon Nov 17 05:27:28 1997
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.Sun.COM [192.9.25.1]) by dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id FAA05412 for <i18n@dkuug.dk>; Mon, 17 Nov 1997 05:27:26 +0100
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM ([129.146.1.25]) by mercury.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/mail.byaddr) with SMTP id UAA05646; Sun, 16 Nov 1997 20:29:57 -0800
Received: from dakota.eng.sun.com (dakota.Eng.Sun.COM [129.146.74.35])
	by Eng.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-5.3) with SMTP id UAA04270;
	Sun, 16 Nov 1997 20:26:49 -0800
Received: from mool.eng.sun.com by dakota.eng.sun.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id UAA26781; Sun, 16 Nov 1997 20:26:46 -0800
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 1997 20:26:37 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time)
From: Ienup Sung <is@dakota-76.Eng.Sun.COM>
Reply-To: Ienup Sung <is@dakota-76.Eng.Sun.COM>
Subject: Re: (i18n.383) Latin 0 current proposal and ISO/IEC 9995-3 international  keyboard standard (Fwd)
To: i18n@dkuug.dk, unicode@unicode.org
Message-ID: <Roam2.0.6.879740797.14338.is@dakota-76>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE

In case you are also interested in the status of Latin-0.=0A=0A>-----------=
-----Begin Forwarded Message----------------<=0A=0ADate: Sun, 16 Nov 1997 2=
0:18:52 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time)=0AFrom: Ienup Sung <is@dakota-76>=0AS=
ubject: Re: (i18n.383) Latin 0 current proposal and ISO/IEC 9995-3=0Aintern=
ational  keyboard standard To: =3D?us-ascii?Q?Alain_LaBont=3DE9_-_2?=3D=0A<=
alb@riq.qc.ca>=0A=0AThanks for the additional info. I remember that you als=
o forwarded info on=0Athe status of Latin-0 at SC2/WG3 that ballots (concur=
rent NP and FCD) are=0Agoing to close in the next weeks. Just wanted to sha=
re the info...=0A=0AMerci beaucoup,=0A=0AIenup=0A=0A=0A] A 11:27 14/11/97 -=
0800, Ienup Sung a =E9crit :=0A] >Thanks for the info. Would you please enl=
ighten me whether there will be=0A] >any change in the code positions, esp.=
 Euro?=0A] >=0A] >So far it looks like Euro, <Y=A8>, <oe> and <OE> will tak=
e the positions of=0A] >=A4, '=A8', '=B4' and '=B8', respectively, at the I=
SO 8859-15.=0A] >=0A] >Thanks for your time,=0A] >=0A] >Ienup=0A] =0A] [Ala=
in] :=0A] No change is likely to occur except for the EURO SIGN, which will=
 most=0A] probably come back to the original proposal (it was then replacin=
g the=0A] CURRENCY SIGN). The current proposal abstract is (I added for you=
 a note=0A] between parenthseis for 11/01):=0A] =0A] 10/08 LATIN SMALL LETT=
ER S WITH CARON (LETTRE MINUSCULE LATINE S CARON)=0A] 11/01 (** change like=
ly to 10/04 **) EURO SIGN (SYMBOLE EURO) =0A] 11/04 LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Z =
WITH CARON (LETTRE MAJUSCULE LATINE Z CARON)=0A] 11/08 LATIN SMALL LETTER Z=
 WITH CARON (LETTRE MINUSCULE LATINE Z CARON)=0A] 11/12 LATIN CAPITAL LIGAT=
URE OE (DIGRAMME SOUD=C9 MAJUSCULE LATIN OE)=0A] 11/13 LATIN SMALL LIGATURE=
 OE (DIGRAMME SOUD=C9 MINUSCULE LATIN OE)=0A] 11/14 LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Y =
WITH DIAERESIS (LETTRE MAJUSCULE LATINE Y=0A] TR=C9MA)=0A] =0A] Btw the mee=
ting last week of ISO/IEC JTC1/WG5 (ex-JTC1/SC18/WG9) in=0A] Cupertino, dea=
ling with keyboards, also recommended that the CURRENCY=0A] SYMBOL key posi=
tion in ISO/IEC 9995-3 international keyboard be changed to=0A] EURO SIGN a=
s well (it means that those choosing to implement exact Latin 0=0A] for the=
 EURO SIGN and which were already supporting the ISO/IEC 9995-3=0A] keyboar=
d for exact Latin 1 would not even have a change to do, as far as=0A] codin=
g is concerned (font is another matter, of course).=0A] =0A] The CURRENCY S=
YMBOL is recommended to be moved in the international=0A] keyboard on level=
 3 of the same key where it was in level 2 in the current=0A] keyboard stan=
dard (i.e on the same key as digit 4, in international "group=0A] 2"; (so f=
ar there was *no* character in level 3 of this international=0A] group). As=
 an editor, I've been instructed to revise a PDAM to ISO/IEC=0A] 9995-3 whi=
ch I had already prepared concerning the EURO SIGN issue on=0A] keyboards a=
nd take measures to initiate an international ballot on this=0A] slight cha=
nge of the international keyboard standard. Contrary to my=0A] initial prop=
osal, JTC1/WG5 will *not* make recommendations regarding=0A] national keybo=
ard layouts (only on the international keyboard standard=0A] ISO/IEC 9995-3=
). Consensus was reached on this issue to the satisfaction of=0A] all parti=
es.=0A] =0A] Alain LaBont=E9=0A] Cairo=0A=0A=0A>----------------End Forward=
ed Message----------------<=0A
