From ALB%SEAS@liverpool.ac.uk Tue Jan 21 01:26:29 1992
Received: from danpost2.uni-c.dk by dkuug.dk via EUnet with SMTP (5.64+/8+bit/IDA-1.2.8)
	id AA06762; Tue, 21 Jan 92 01:26:29 +0100
Received: from vm.uni-c.dk by danpost2.uni-c.dk (5.65/1.34)
	id AA27561; Tue, 21 Jan 92 00:26:12 GMT
Message-Id: <9201210026.AA27561@danpost2.uni-c.dk>
Received: from vm.uni-c.dk by vm.uni-c.dk (IBM VM SMTP V2R1) with BSMTP id 6990;
   Tue, 21 Jan 92 01:26:04 DNT
Received: from UKACRL.BITNET by vm.uni-c.dk (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 8723;
 Tue, 21 Jan 92 01:26:03 DNT
Received: from RL.IB by UKACRL.BITNET (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 5208; Tue,
 21 Jan 92 00:26:30 GMT
Received: 
           from RL.IB by UK.AC.RL.IB (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 0481; Tue, 21
                Jan 92 00:26:29 GMT
Via:            UK.AC.LIV.IBM; 21 JAN 92  0:26:26 GMT
Received:       from ALB@SEAS by MAILER(4.1.a);  21 Jan 1992 00:27:24 GM
Addressed-To:   I18N@EARN.DK.DKUUG Via MAILER
Addressed-From: ALAIN_LA_BONTE (Alain LaBonte O1 418 644 1835)
Subject: 
            Names of ideographs - Mnemonics wanted by a desperate Westerner who
                loves the
Date:           Tue, 21 Jan 1992  00:25 GMT
To: I18N@DKUUG.DK
From: ALB <ALB%SEAS@liverpool.ac.uk>
X-Charset: ASCII
X-Char-Esc: 29

:I can easily guess what
:":" would be called but I have no idea what symbolic name of "Kuro", the first
:character of my family name, is.  I'd have to look it up in the JIS
:standard book anyway.  So why don't we just use the codepont itself?
:-kuro (JISX0208_39x75-:)

This confirms what I always told to SC2. I even proposed a name based on the
number of strokes of each radical (if my memory is good SC2/WG3 N 125), but
the Japanese told me that they could not agree on Chinese methods, which
don't count the same way as the Japanese. With today's method, they said,
they will need a piece of software to retrieve a character's coding given its
shape. My method would have been useful for all (Westerners, Japanese,
Chinese and Koreans): given the shape, and agreed an international method
(that was part of the problem between the Asians), one could have approximately
but accurately enough to look in a list, retrieved the name of the character,
and hence, its coding.
Given the coding (and we are back to today's method, which I hate, being a lover
of Chinese characters with enough notions of Chinese to write a letter), of
course, it's easy to find the character, but the reverse is still not true...

                   Alain LaBont/e
                   Minist\ere des Communications du Qu/ebec
