From ducrot@helpe.inria.fr Tue Nov 30 08:01:58 1993
Received: from concorde.inria.fr by dkuug.dk with SMTP id AA22388
  (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4j for <sc24@dkuug.dk>); Tue, 30 Nov 1993 09:01:46 +0100
Received: from helpe.inria.fr by concorde.inria.fr; Tue, 30 Nov 1993 09:02:44 +0100
Received: from localhost.inria.fr by helpe.inria.fr; Tue, 30 Nov 1993 08:01:59 GMT
Message-Id: <199311300801.AA09865@helpe.inria.fr>
To: Chris Cartledge <C.Cartledge@sheffield.ac.uk>
Cc: IST/31 <IST31@sheffield.ac.uk>, SC24 list <sc24@dkuug.dk>,
        IST/5 UK Programming Languages <ukproglang@xopen.co.uk>,
        ducrot@helpe.inria.fr
Subject: Re: (SC24.53) Apparent slow production of standards in SC24 (and SC22) 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 29 Nov 93 17:21:44 +0100."
             <199311291932.AA03599@dkuug.dk> 
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 93 08:01:58 +0000
From: Andre.Ducrot@inria.fr
X-Mts: smtp
X-Charset: ASCII
X-Char-Esc: 29

Since your ISO paper does not give any example, it has no value. I
disagree with your last statement. This was may be our practice under
some other sub-committees. It is no more true. If you look to IPI, the
revision of GKS and CGM, you will find completely different time-scales.

Regards

Andre