From paulh@cwi.nl Tue Nov 16 15:53:39 1993
Received: from charon.cwi.nl by dkuug.dk with SMTP id AA21781
  (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4j for <sc24@dkuug.dk>); Tue, 16 Nov 1993 14:52:45 +0100
Received: from visarend.cwi.nl by charon.cwi.nl with SMTP
	id AA25794 (5.65b/3.12/CWI-Amsterdam); Tue, 16 Nov 1993 14:53:43 +0100
Received: by visarend.cwi.nl with SMTP
	id AA11535 (5.65b/3.8/CWI-Amsterdam); Tue, 16 Nov 1993 14:53:42 +0100
Message-Id: <9311161353.AA11535=paulh@visarend.cwi.nl>
To: Chris Cartledge <C.Cartledge@sheffield.ac.uk>
Cc: IST/31 <IST31@sheffield.ac.uk>, SC24 list <sc24@dkuug.dk>, paulh@cwi.nl
Subject: Re: (SC24.49) Slow production of Standards in SC24 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 15 Nov 1993 10:35:03 MET."
             <199311150943.AA08619@dkuug.dk> 
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1993 14:53:39 +0100
From: Paul ten Hagen <Paul.ten.Hagen@cwi.nl>
X-Charset: ASCII
X-Char-Esc: 29

Dear Chris
I would appreciate a more specific statement about standards
procedures, e.g., which one takes so long (in fact longer than SC24 exists?)
and what prosedure special to sc24 cuases all of this.
Thank you in advance for some further input.
Paul ten Hagen

