From puk@multi10.netcomi.com Wed Jan 28 15:42:16 1998 Received: from multi10.netcomi.com (puk@multi10.netcomi.com [204.58.155.210]) by dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id PAA12320 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 1998 15:42:12 +0100 Received: (from puk@localhost) by multi10.netcomi.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) id IAA27449; Wed, 28 Jan 1998 08:41:48 -0600 Received: from flash.mrj.com (flash.mrj.com [192.101.175.30]) by multi10.netcomi.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id IAA27438 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 1998 08:41:45 -0600 Received: from 1010-LABPC.mrj.com (1010-LABPC.mrj.com [205.160.13.58]) by flash.mrj.com (8.6.10/8.6.10) with SMTP id JAA12940; Wed, 28 Jan 1998 09:37:20 -0500 Received: by 1010-LABPC.mrj.com with Microsoft Mail id <01BD2BD0.EBCCC760@1010-LABPC.mrj.com>; Wed, 28 Jan 1998 09:41:34 -0500 Message-ID: <01BD2BD0.EBCCC760@1010-LABPC.mrj.com> From: Rafael Goldsmith Old-To: Richard Puk , "'Jean Stride'" <100434.3031@compuserve.com> Cc: Steve Carson , ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 24 Subject: RE: (SC24.369) SC24 Plenary Date: Wed, 28 Jan 1998 09:41:33 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Loop: forwarded by puk@igraphics.com To: puk@rbc.dec.com To All: 1. From the WG7 perspective, I see mostly maintenance work for IIF, = PIKS and BIIF; for example, registration, testing, defects, and the = like. =20 2. Regarding new activities, we'll have a short brainstorming session at = the WG7 February meeting in Annapolis, Maryland to explore what the JTC1 = business team work may bring to WG7, but the results may not be ready to = initiate work at the SC24 meeting in July. Other alternatives would = include joining forces to support new initiatives that SC24 has been = working, i.e., PNG and VRML. 3. The idea about having a short meeting at Orlando, following = Siggraph98 sounds plausible; I don't know how that would influence the = ability of WG7 members to participate there rather than at London. I = will ask the group. Cheers! Rafael Goldsmith, WG7 Convener. ---------- From: Jean Stride Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 1998 5:26 AM To: Richard Puk Cc: Steve Carson; ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 24 Subject: (SC24.369) SC24 Plenary Hello, Just so that you are aware I am on vacation from 24 May 1998 - 11 June 1998. I would much rather we held a short meeting, after SIGGRAPH, in the = Orlando area. >From a secretariat point of view this is how things currently stand: IMAGING As BIIF will be complete by then, there is no current work for WG 7, nor any "formal" proposals being put before SC 24 at the present. (NPs may come from the February meeting) PNG Having spoken to one of the PNG editors, we expect to launch the PNG = FCD in April, so it will still be under ballot in July, so "formally" we can not edit/act = on it at that time. (We could however start preparing it in "ISO" format earlier). The current time for FCD ballot is 6 months, although the draft=20 JTC 1 directives propose 4m14days will become the norm (but this is not = yet approved). There will need to be some kind of editing meeting in the Autumn. GKS/PHIGS/CGM - no real business, just some editing work IGBT - No firm work at present I think the major task of any SC 24 meeting will be to rethink our = future - we need to start some concrete work if we are to continue as any knid of seperate entity Jean