From mpeacock@ANSI.org  Fri May 19 19:31:11 2000
Received: from email1.ansi.org (mail.ansi.org [165.254.114.6])
	by dkuug.dk (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id TAA36690;
	Fri, 19 May 2000 19:31:10 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from mpeacock@ANSI.org)
Received: by email1.ansi.org with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9)
	id <LHS1GPNQ>; Fri, 19 May 2000 13:30:05 -0400
Message-ID: <7C5DF9EFFBA9D11187E90020356797B201606982@email1.ansi.org>
From: Marisa Peacock <mpeacock@ANSI.org>
To: "'Stephen Michell'" <steve@maurya.on.ca>, John Reid <jkr@rl.ac.uk>
Cc: sc22info@dkuug.dk, keld@dkuug.dk
Subject: RE: (SC22docs.970) SC22 N3107 - Calling Notice and Venue Informat
	ion for  the JTC 1/SC 22 Plenary Meeting, 12-15 September 2000, Nara, Jap
	an
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 13:30:03 -0400
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9)

John Hill has suggested that if there is sufficient interest in SC 22's
discussing this at the meeting, there should be a contribution submitted
from an NB or WG and I can add to the agenda.  

Marisa 
Marisa Peacock
ANSI
11 West 42nd Street
New York, NY  10036
Telephone:  (212) 642-4976
Fax:             (212) 840-2298
Email:  mpeacock@ansi.org

		-----Original Message-----
		From:	Stephen Michell [mailto:steve@maurya.on.ca]
		Sent:	Friday, May 19, 2000 11:10 AM
		To:	John Reid
		Cc:	sc22info@dkuug.dk; mpeacock@ansi.org; keld@dkuug.dk
		Subject:	(SC22docs.970) SC22 N3107 - Calling Notice
and Venue Information for  the JTC 1/SC 22 Plenary Meeting, 12-15 September
2000, Nara, Japan

		John Reid wrote:

		>  >
		> > STATUS:
		> > The document is at:
hhttp://www.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/open/n3107.doc
		> > <hhttp://www.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/open/n3107.doc>
		> >
		> > Please note that the Japanese National Body requests
return to them of the
		> > Registration Form not later than 1 August 2000.  Hotel
reservations should
		> > be made by 11 August 2000.  A copy of the
		> > Registration Form should also be forwarded to the SC22
Secretariat.
		>
		> How are those of us who do not work on PCs supposed cope
with this?
		>

		I agree with this sentiment. Even for those who work on PC's
- MS native
		documents can contain macros and hence active viruses. They
are not suitable for
		distribution outside a single security domain!

		>
		> John Reid.

		...stephen
