From rinehuls@Radix.Net  Wed Dec  8 18:28:28 1999
Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31])
	by dkuug.dk (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id SAA24993;
	Wed, 8 Dec 1999 18:28:27 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from rinehuls@Radix.Net)
Received: from saltmine.radix.net (saltmine.radix.net [207.192.128.40])
	by mail1.radix.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA06220;
	Wed, 8 Dec 1999 12:30:06 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 12:30:04 -0500 (EST)
From: William Rinehuls <rinehuls@Radix.Net>
To: sc22info@dkuug.dk
cc: keld simonsen <keld@dkuug.dk>
Subject: SC22 N3045 - PL/I Project Editor Recommendation - Standards for Periodic Review
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.96.991208122251.24160B-100000@saltmine.radix.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

____________________ beginning of title page _______________________
ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22
Programming languages, their environments and system software interfaces
Secretariat:  U.S.A.  (ANSI)

ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22
N3045

TITLE:
PL/I Project Editor Recommendation - Standards for Periodic Review -
PLENARY 2000 ACTION ITEM

DATE ASSIGNED:
1999-12-08

SOURCE:
Secretariat, ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22

BACKWARD POINTER:
N/A

DOCUMENT TYPE:
Other

PROJECT NUMBER:
JTC 1.22.06

STATUS:
SC22 will take action on this recommendation at the September 2000 SC22
Plenary

ACTION IDENTIFIER:
FYI

DUE DATE:
N/A

DISTRIBUTION:
Text

CROSS REFERENCE:
N3044

DISTRIBUTION FORM:
Def


Address reply to:
ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 Secretariat
William C. Rinehuls
8457 Rushing Creek Court
Springfield, VA 22153 USA
Telephone:  +1 (703) 912-9680
Fax:  +1 (703) 912-2973
email: rinehuls@radix.net

_________ end of title page; beginning of report ____________________


Subject: Re: (SC22docs.879) SC22 N3044 - Standards for Periodic Review


 
ISO/IEC 6522:1992 -    PL/I General Purpose Subset

As Project Editor, I recommend reaffirmation/ continuation of
this standard.  The reasons are the same as those for retaining
IS 6160 last year: while no active development is underway on
PL/I (and hence costs to JTC1 and SC22  are minimal), the
standards are important reference documents for a user community
that still exists and is active.  That justification is even
stronger for 6522 than for 6160, since we have been told that a
new implemention is underway in the open source community.

  John Klensin
  Project Editor, PL/I

____________________ end of SC22 N3045 ______________________________

