From rinehuls@Radix.Net Tue Jul 6 18:43:50 1999 Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [209.48.224.31]) by dkuug.dk (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id SAA09321; Tue, 6 Jul 1999 18:43:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rinehuls@Radix.Net) Received: from saltmine.radix.net (saltmine.radix.net [209.48.224.40]) by mail1.radix.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA01494; Tue, 6 Jul 1999 12:43:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 6 Jul 1999 12:43:49 -0400 (EDT) From: William Rinehuls To: sc22docs@dkuug.dk cc: keld simonsen Subject: Notice of Document Availability - SC22 N2952 - Vote Summary of NWI for C++ Performance Technical Report Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII (Please note that the vote of the United Kingdom on the JTC 1 ballot was not received in time for inclusion in the vote summary. It is attached only to this notice.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 Programming languages, their environments and system software interfaces Secretariat: U.S.A. (ANSI) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 N2952 TITLE: ISO/IEC JTC 1 Summary of Voting on the Proposal for a New Work Item: Information Technology - Programming Languages - Technical Report on C++ Performance (Technical Report Type 3) DATE ASSIGNED: 1999-07-02 SOURCE: Secretariat, ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 BACKWARD POINTER: N/A DOCUMENT TYPE: Summary of Voting PROJECT NUMBER: JTC 1.22.18015 STATUS: The document is at: "http://www.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/def/n2952.htm". The vote of the United Kingdom Member Body was received after JTC 1 ballot closure. It is attached at their request. ACTION IDENTIFIER: FYI to SC22 Member Bodies; ACT to WG21 DUE DATE: N/A DISTRIBUTION: html CROSS REFERENCE: N/A DISTRIBUTION FORM: Def Address reply to: ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 Secretariat William C. Rinehuls 8457 Rushing Creek Court Springfield, VA 22153 USA Telephone: +1 (703) 912-9680 Fax: +1 (703) 912-2973 email: rinehuls@radix.net ------------- end of title page; beginning of UK vote -------------------- Subject: FW: UK Ballot response on J1N5784 - NWI Q1. Do you accept the proposal in document J1N5784 as a sufficient definition of the new work item? (If you have responded "NO" to the above question, you are required to comment). YES Q2. Do you support the addition of the new work item to the programme of work of the technical committee? YES Q3. Do you commit yourself to participate in the development of this new work item? YES Q4. Are you able to offer a project editor who will dedicate his/her effors to the advancement and maintenance of this report? (If "YES" please identify......................................) NO - we understand that an editor has already been appointed. Q5. Do you have a major contribution or a reference document ready for submittal? NO Q6. Will you have such a contribution in 90 days? NO If there are any problems with the above response, please let me know. David Keech BSI LONDON ------------------------------- end ----------------------------------