From rinehuls@access.digex.net Mon Jun 29 23:40:26 1998 Received: from access2.digex.net (qlrhmEbBUV1EY@access2.digex.net [205.197.245.193]) by dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id XAA00896 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 1998 23:40:25 +0200 Received: from localhost (rinehuls@localhost) by access2.digex.net (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id RAA13927 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 1998 17:41:44 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 17:41:43 -0400 (EDT) From: "william c. rinehuls" To: sc22docs@dkuug.dk Subject: SC22 N2741 - Disposition of Comments Report for DTR 15581 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII _________________ beginning of title page _________________________ ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 Programming languages, their environments and system software interfaces Secretariat: U.S.A. (ANSI) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 N2741 TITLE: Disposition of Comments Report for DTR 15581 - Information technology - Programming languages - Enhanced Data Type Facilities in Fortran DATE ASSIGNED: 1998-06-29 SOURCE: Secretariat, ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 BACKWARD POINTER: N/A DOCUMENT TYPE: Disposition of Comments Report PROJECT NUMBER: JTC 1.22.02.01.04 STATUS: N/A ACTION IDENTIFIER: FYI DUE DATE: N/A DISTRIBUTION: Text CROSS REFERENCE: SC22 N2687 DISTRIBUTION FORM: Def Address reply to: ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 Secretariat William C. Rinehuls 8457 Rushing Creek Court Springfield, VA 22153 USA Telephone: +1 (703) 912-9680 Fax: +1 (703) 912-2973 email: rinehuls@access.digex.net ______________ end of title page; beginning of report ________________ Disposition of Comments on Approval Ballot for DTR 15581 Information technology - Programming languages Enhanced Data Type Facilities in Fortran Both the United States and the United Kingdom submitted idential comments (which originated from the Project Editor): (1) Section 3 of the DTR misses a necessary edit to a constraint in Fortran that currently prohibits allocatable dummy arguments and function results. This is in contradiction to sections 2.2 and 2.3 of the DTR, which discuss such entities. Add the following edit in section 3 of the DTR. 5.1, R501-R506, 3rd constraint [48:1-2] Delete: "that is not a dummy argument or a function result" (2) The DTR fails to specify the semantics of deallocation of objects with allocatable components. This specification was part of the original (Fortran 95) requirement but was accidentally omitted when it was converted to a TR. Add a new paragraph to section 2.4 (after the existing second para): "Deallocation of a variable containing an ultimate allocatable array component automatically deallocates all such components of the variable that are currently allocated." Add the following edit in section 3 of the DTR. 6.3.3.1, new paragraph at end of section [83:18+] "When a variable of derived type is deallocated, any ultimate component that is a currently allocated allocatable array is deallocated (as if by a DEALLOCATE statement." Both of these comments have been accepted and the recommended changes have been made to the document. There were no other comments. ___________________ end of SC22 N2741 ________________________________