From rinehuls@access.digex.net Mon Aug 4 17:59:39 1997 Received: from access4.digex.net (qlrhmEbBUV1EY@access4.digex.net [205.197.245.195]) by dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA15762 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 1997 17:59:35 +0200 Received: from localhost (rinehuls@localhost) by access4.digex.net (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id LAA09564 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 1997 11:59:27 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 1997 11:59:26 -0400 (EDT) From: "william c. rinehuls" To: sc22docs@dkuug.dk Subject: SC22 N2539 - Disposition of Comments Report on PDAM4 to ISO 9945-1 - POSIX PII Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII ___________________beginning of title page ____________________________ ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 Programming languages, their environments and system software interfaces Secretariat: U.S.A. (ANSI) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 N2539 August 1997 TITLE: Disposition of Comments Report on Concurrent PDAM Registration and PDAM Ballot for: PDAM4 to ISO 9945-1: Information technology - Portable Operating System Interface (POSIX) - Protocol Independent Interfaces (PII) SOURCE: Secretariat, ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 WORK ITEM: JTC 1.22.21.01.03.03 STATUS: N/A CROSS REFERENCE: SC22 N2351 DOCUMENT TYPE: Disposition of Comments Report ACTION: To SC22 Member Bodies for information. Address reply to: ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 Secretariat William C. Rinehuls 8457 Rushing Creek Court Springfield, VA 22153 USA Tel: +1 (703) 912-9680 Fax: +1 (703) 912-2973 email: rinehuls@access.digex.net _____________ end of title page; beginning of report _________________ Disposition of Comments on Concurrent PDAM Registration and PDAM Ballot for: PDAM4 to ISO 9945-1: Information technology - Portable Operating System Interface (POSIX) - Protocol Independent Interfaces (PII) Recommendation: WG15 recommends that Draft 6.6 be forwarded for DAM registration and ballot. ** Country: Canada Comment: An incomplete document has been circulated for ballot and should be replaced by IEEE P1003.1g/D6.5 dated August 1996. Only after reviewing the correct document will we be able to comment further on its contents. The August 1996 Draft 6.5 is the correct draft but there are still some outstanding issues that will be addressed as a result of the UK comments on this document. If they substitute the correct draft and address the other national body (UK) comments then we can change our vote to approve. Response: Accept. The correct draft appropriately amended was circulated. Country: France Comment: AFNOR voted "No". Its vote would be reversed if compatibility problems between X/Open Networking Services (XNS) and IEEE POSIX Protocol Independent Interfaces (PII) which are related to 64 bits environments are resolved. Response: Accept. Co-ordination of the documents was done in the preparation of this draft. Country: Germany Comment: DIN voted "No" on the ballot until the complete draft is presented rather than the "diffs" draft that was originally circulated. Response: Accept. Country: UK Comment: Concern for the co-ordination of the X/Open XNS document and POSIX PII drafts was expressed, with specific detailed descriptions of items to change presented. Response: The draft was amended to account for all of the items in the UK response. ____________________ end of SC22 N2539 ________________________________