From rinehuls@access.digex.net Wed Mar 5 01:04:08 1997 Received: from access4.digex.net (qlrhmEbBUV1EY@access4.digex.net [205.197.245.195]) by dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id BAA08994 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 1997 01:04:05 +0100 Received: from localhost (rinehuls@localhost) by access4.digex.net (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id TAA07076; Tue, 4 Mar 1997 19:04:01 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 4 Mar 1997 19:04:01 -0500 (EST) From: "william c. rinehuls" To: sc22docs@dkuug.dk, miles ellis Subject: SC22 N2429 - Vote Summary on DPTR 15581 - Fortran Data Ty Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII _______________________beginning of title page ______________________ ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 Programming languages, their environments and system software interfaces Secretariat: U.S.A. (ANSI) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 N2429 March 1997 SUBJECT: Summary of Voting on Concurrent PDTR Registration and PDTR Ballot for PDTR 15881: Enhanced Derived Type Facilities in Fortran SOURCE: Secretariat, ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 WORK ITEM: JTC 1.22.02.01.04 STATUS: The PDTR has been registered as PDTR 15581. Resolution 96-4 (docusment SC22 N2301) approved a change in title for this project to "Enhanced Data Type Facilities". CROSS REFERENCE: SC22 N2301, N2318 DOCUMENT TYPE: Summary of Voting ACTION: To SC22 Member Bodies for information. To WG5 for preparation of a Disposition of Comments Report and a recommendation on the further processing of the PDTR. Address reply to: ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 Secretariat William C. Rinehuls 8457 Rushing Creek Court Springfield, VA 22153 USA Tel: +1 (703) 912-9680 Fax: +1 (703) 912-2973 email: rinehuls@access.digex.net _________end of title page; beginning of overall summary ________________ SUMMARY OF VOTING ON Letter Ballot Reference No: SC22 N2318 Circulated by: JTC 1/SC22 Circulation Date: 11-07-1996 Closing Date: 02-21-1997 SUBJECT: Concurrent PDTR Registration and PDTR Ballot for: Enhanced Derived Type Facilities in Fortran The following responses have been received on the subject of PDTR registration: "P" Members supporting registration without comments: 14 "P" Members supporting registration with comments: 1 "P" Members not supporting registration: 0 "P" Members abstaining: 2 "P" Members not voting: 6 The following responses have been received on the subject of PDTR approval: "P" Members supporting approval without comments: 14 "P" Members supporting approval with comments: 1 "P" Members not supporting approval: 0 "P" Members abstaining: 2 "P" Members not voting: 6 Secretariat Action: The PDTR has been registered as PDTR 15581. Please note that Resolution 96-4 from the September 1996 SC22 Plenary approved a change in the title of this project to "Enhanced Data Type Facilities" as noted in the comments from the Germany Member Body. The comment accompanying the abstention vote from Denmark was "Due to lack of Danish expertise". The comment accompanying the abstention vote from Sweden was "Expert resources not available." The comments accompanying the affirmative vote from Germany are attached. WG5 is requested to prepare a Disposition of Comments Report and a recommendation on the further processing of the PDTR. _________end of overall summary; beginnin go detail registration summary _ ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22 LETTER BALLOT SUMMARY PDTR Registration PROJECT NO: JTC 1.22.02.01.04 SUBJECT: Concurrent PDTR Registration and PDTR Ballot for: Enhanced Derived Type Facilites in Fortran Reference Document No: N2318 Ballot Document No: N2318 Circulation Date: 11-07-1996 Closing Date: 02-21-1997 Circulated To: SC22 P, O, L Circulated By: Secretariat SUMMARY OF VOTING AND COMMENTS RECEIVED Approve Disapprove Abstain Comments Not Voting 'P' Members Australia (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Austria (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Belgium ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Brazil (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Canada (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) China ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Czech Republic ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Denmark ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) ( ) Egypt (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Finland ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) France (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Germany (X) ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) Ireland (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Japan (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Netherlands (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Romania ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Russian Federation (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Slovenia (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Sweden ( ) ( ) (X) (X) ( ) Switzerland ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) UK (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Ukraine (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) USA (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 'O' Members Argentina ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Bulgaria ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Cuba ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Greece ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Hungary ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Iceland ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) India ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Indonesia ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Italy ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Korea Republic ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) New Zealand ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Norway ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Poland ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Portugal ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Singapore ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Thailand ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Turkey ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Yugoslavia ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ____________end of registration summary; beginning of approval summary__ ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22 LETTER BALLOT SUMMARY PDTR Approval PROJECT NO: JTC 1.22.02.01.04 SUBJECT: Concurrent PDTR Registration and PDTR Ballot for: Enhanced Derived Type Facilites in Fortran Reference Document No: N2318 Ballot Document No: N2318 Circulation Date: 11-07-1996 Closing Date: 02-21-1997 Circulated To: SC22 P, O, L Circulated By: Secretariat SUMMARY OF VOTING AND COMMENTS RECEIVED Approve Disapprove Abstain Comments Not Voting 'P' Members Australia (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Austria (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Belgium ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Brazil (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Canada (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) China ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Czech Republic ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Denmark ( ) ( ) (X) (X) ( ) Egypt (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Finland ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) France (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Germany (X) ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) Ireland (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Japan (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Netherlands (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Romania ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Russian Federation (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Slovenia (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Sweden ( ) ( ) (X) (X) ( ) Switzerland ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) UK (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Ukraine (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) USA (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 'O' Members Argentina ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Bulgaria ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Cuba ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Greece ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Hungary ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Iceland ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) India ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Indonesia ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Italy ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Korea Republic ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) New Zealand ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Norway ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Poland ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Portugal ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Singapore ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Thailand ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Turkey ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Yugoslavia ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) _______________end of approval summary; beginning of comments___________ DIN comments on JTC 1/SC22 N 2318 (PDTR Enhanced Data Type Facilities): "Change all "1996" that refer to IS 1539-1 to "1997". page i, title: Change "Enhanced Derived Type Facilities" to "Enhanced Data Type Facilities". This is to line up with SC22's change of subject of JTC 1.20.02.01.04. Page iv, Introduction: The first paragraph does not fully comply to WG5/N1152, section 3. Especially, delete "with other new facilities": there might also be difficulties in integrating with existing features. Page 1, title: Change "Data-type enhancements" to "Enhanced Data Type Facilities". Page 1, section 1.1 First par. is incomplete: mention dummy arguments and function results. Page 3, section 3.1, last bullet: Change "On exit" to "If it is currently allocated on exit" -- if it is not currently allocated, no deallocation and thus no change in the allocation status occurs. Page 4, Example: Before the ALLOCATE statement, add a line IF (ALLOCATED(ARRAY)) DEALLOCATE(ARRAY) ! or STOP It is illegal to allocate a currently allocated array, this should be checked instead of causing an error in the subsequent ALLOCATE. page 4, section 3.3: Change "after execution of the statement" to "after evaluation of the expression": this allows more economic use of memory, which may be very important in expressions involving large arrays. page 6: Change "optimizations, when" to "optimizations, if"? To avoid confusion: isn't it so that the optimization occurs at the time *when* the variable's allocatable component is allocated, but only *if* the expression's allocatable component is allocated? page 7, Example, FUNCTION RP_ADD_R: Before the assignments, add IF (.NOT.ALLOCATED(P1%COEFF)) STOP "P1%COEFF IS NOT ALLOCATED." IF (SIZE(P1%COEFF)==0 ) STOP "P1%COEFF HAS SIZE ZERO." Both conditions would cause problems with the assignments, and should be checked. page 7, Example: Also show the program output. pages 8+: Check/update edits to refer to WG5/N1191 or X3J3/96-007r1. page 12, edit for [109] Change "allocatec" to "allocated". ________________end of SC22 N2429 ___________________________________