ISO/IEC JTC = 1/SC22

Programming = languages, their environments and system software = interfaces

Secretariat: = U.S.A. (ANSI)

ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 = N3739

TITLE:

Disposition of = Comments Report for SC 22 N 3722, Summary of Voting on SC 22 N 3661, FCD Ballot = for the revision of ISO/IEC 1539-1:1997-Programming = language-Fortran

DATE = ASSIGNED:

2004-05-18

SOURCE:

WG 5 Convenor (J. = Reid)

BACKWARD = POINTER:

DOCUMENT = TYPE:

Disposition of = Comments Report

PROJECT = NUMBER:

22.1539

STATUS:

The text of the = FCD will be sent to ISO Central Secretariat for FDIS = Ballot.

ACTION = IDENTIFIER:

FYI

DUE = DATE:

DISTRIBUTION:

TEXT

CROSS = REFERENCE:

N3722

DISTRIBUTION = FORM:

Def

Address reply = to:

ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 Secretariat

Sally Seitz

ANSI

25 West 43rd = Street

New York, NY 10036

Telephone: = (212) 642-4918

Fax: &n= bsp; (212) 840-2298

Email: = sseitz@ansi.org

_______________End of Cover Page, Beginning of Document____________________

= Response to comments on Fortran 2003 FCD

&nbs= p; Richard Maine

At its May 2004 meeting, WG5 considered all of the ballot = comments submitted on the Fortran 2003 FCD. WG5 appreciates the comments = and believes that they have resulted in an improved document for the = DIS. Most of the comments were accepted, as detailed = below.

Canadian comments

T1 - accepted

Also "an" -> "a" before the proposed edit

T2 - accepted as is

T3 - no edit made

This is discussed in = detail in paper J3/04-294.

E1 - accepted

Also 4 more cases fixed on [444:10,11]

UK comments

C1 - accepted

Also add "in this = case," after the semicolon.

C2 - accepted

[251:12] Also added a = comma at the start of the insert.

[411:5] Used similar edit = from the US comments instead.

C3 - partly accepted

[253:35+3] "a module = or internal" -> "an internal or = module"

The proposed new note was = felt unnecessary.

C4 - accepted as is

C5 - partly accepted

The third edit attempted = to fix a problem that cannot occur,

as explained in = 04-291r1. The edit prohibits a potentially

useful form. = Therefore, the third edit was not done.

C6 - accepted as is

C7 - partly accepted

WG5 agreed that the = existing constraint was inconsistent, but

felt that there were = potential implementation concerns with

deleting it = completely. Therefore, the constraint was

instead modified to a = simpler and more consistent form.

C8 - partly accepted

Debate in WG5 plenary = session on the issue of whether

PRIVATE procedures are = allowed to have binding labels lead

to straw votes in favor of allowing the binding labels.

Therefore, the proposed = edits to disallow them were omitted.

The other edits were = accepted, some with minor editorial

= changes.

C9 - accepted as is

E1 - withdrawn

E2 - accepted as is

E3 - accepted as is

E4 - accepted

Minor editorial changes = made.

E5.1, E5.2 - accepted as is =

E5.3-E5.5 - withdrawn

US comments

all accepted

Minor editorial = changes.

ISO Comments

The responses to the ISO comments are detailed in = N1589.

Sally = Seitz

Program = Administrator

ANSI

25 = West 43rd Street

New = York, NY 10036<= /p>

Phone: (212) 642-4918

Fax: (212) 840-2298