Subject: SC 22 N 3456 - Summary of Voting on SC 22 N 3509, DCOR 1 to ISO/I EC 9945-1

From: Matthew Deane <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 09:52:53 -0500

ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22
Programming languages, their environments and system software interfaces
Secretariat:  U.S.A.  (ANSI)

ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 N 3456

TITLE:
Summary of Voting on SC 22 N 3509, Letter Ballot for Draft Technical
Corrigendum 1 for ISO/IEC 9945-1:2002, POSIX - Part 1: Base Definitions 

DATE ASSIGNED:
2003-02-20

SOURCE:
SC 22 Secretariat

BACKWARD POINTER:
N/A

DOCUMENT TYPE:
Summary of Voting

PROJECT NUMBER:
22.21.04.01.01

STATUS:
The NB comments are sent to WG 15 for resolution, preparation of the
disposition of comments report, and preparation of the final text for
publication.

ACTION IDENTIFIER:
ACT

DUE DATE:
N/A

DISTRIBUTION:
Text

CROSS REFERENCE:
N3509

DISTRIBUTION FORM:
Def

Address reply to:
ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 Secretariat
Matt Deane
ANSI
11 West 42nd Street
New York, NY  10036
Telephone:  (212) 642-4992
Fax:             (212) 840-2298
Email:  [email-masked]

_______ end of title page; beginning of summary ______________

                      SUMMARY OF VOTING ON

Letter Ballot:		SC22 N3509
Circulated by:               JTC 1/SC22
Circulation Date:            2002-10-31
Closing Date:                 2003-01-31

SUBJECT:  Summary of Voting on SC 22 N 3509, Letter Ballot for Draft
Technical Corrigendum 1 for ISO/IEC 9945-1:2002, POSIX - Part 1: Base
Definitions 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

The following responses have been received on the subject of approval:

"P" Members supporting approval without comment                   

10 (Canada, China, Czech Republic, Germany, Japan, Republic of Korea,
Netherlands, Switzerland, United Kingdom, USA)

"P" Members supporting approval with comments              

1 (Norway)         

"P" Members not supporting approval       

-

"P" Members abstaining                    

1 (France)

"P" Members not voting                    

12 (Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Denmark, Egypt, Finland, Ireland, DPR of
Korea, Romania, Russian Federation, Slovenia, Ukraine)

___________ end of summary, beginning of NB comments _____________

Norway
1. As the document is referencing to an ISO standard, it should refer to it.
We propose the changes to be:
In the title: add ISO/IEC 9945-1 9945-2 etc. like in:
"ISO/IEC 9945-1:2002/COR 1:200x and IEEE P1003.1-2001/Cor 1-200x Draft
Standard ..."
In the Abstract add the same reference, as in:
"Abstract: This Technical Corrigendum adresses problems discovered since the
approval of ISO/IEC 9945-1:2002 and IEEE Std P1003.1-2001. These are mainly
due to resolving integration issues raised by the merger of the Base
documents that went into ISO/IEC 9945-1:2002 and IEEE Std P1003.1-:2001"
2. As the 4 ISO 9945 parts should be handled as a whole, there should only
be one combined corrigendum.