From rinehuls@access.digex.net Mon Nov 4 19:19:28 1996 Received: from access4.digex.net (qlrhmEbBUV1EY@access4.digex.net [205.197.245.195]) by dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id TAA06920 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 1996 19:18:33 +0100 Received: from localhost (rinehuls@localhost) by access4.digex.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id NAA16773 ; for ; Mon, 4 Nov 1996 13:18:15 -0500 Date: Mon, 4 Nov 1996 13:18:14 -0500 (EST) From: "william c. rinehuls" X-Sender: rinehuls@access4.digex.net To: sc22docs@dkuug.dk Subject: CORRECTED Document SC22 N2326 - Voting Summary on LB 2175 - PCTE Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII (Note: The only change in this corrected copy is on the detailed summary page where Slovenia, in the original transmission, was counted as "not voting" and did in fact vote "approval". The Slovenia vote was corrected counted in the overall summary page.) __________________beginning of title page ______________________________ ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 Programming languages, their environments and system software interfaces Secretariat: U.S.A. (ANSI) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 N2326 Corrected November 1996 TITLE: Summary of Voting on Proposed Draft Amendment 1: Fine-Grain Extensions to ISO/IEC 13719-1: Infor- mation Technology - Portable Common Tool Environ- ment (PCTE), Part 1: Abstract Specification SOURCE: Secretariat, ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 WORK ITEM: JTC 1.22.47.3 STATUS: N/A CROSS REFERENCE: SC22 N2175 DOCUMENT TYPE: Summary of Voting ACTION: To SC22 Member Bodies for information. To WG22 for preparation of a Disposition of Comments Report and a recommendation on the further processing of the PDAM. Address reply to: ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 Secretariat William C. Rinehuls 8457 Rushing Creek Court Springfield, VA USA 22153 Tel: +1 (703) 912-9680 Fax: +1 (703) 912-2973 email: rinehuls@access.digex.net ________________end of title page, beginning of summary page ____________ SUMMARY OF VOTING ON Letter Ballot Reference No: SC22 N2175 Circulated By: JTC 1/SC22 Circulation Date: 07-08-1996 Closing Date: 10-21-1996 SUBJECT: Proposed Draft Amendment 1: Fine-Grain Object Extensions to ISO/IEC 13719-1: Information Technology - Portable Common Tool Environment (PCTE), Part 1: Abstract Specification ________________________________________________________________________ The following responses have been received on the subject of approval: "P" Members supporting approval without comment: 11 "P" Members supporting approval with comment: 1 "P" Members not supporting approval: 0 "P" Members abstaining 6 "P" Members not voting: 3 _____________________________________________________________________ Secretariat Action: The comment accompanying the abstention vote from Austria and Sweden was: "Lack of Expert resources". The comment accompanying the abstention vote from France and the Netherlands was: "Lack of resources". The comments accompanying the affirmative vote from the United Kingdom have been forwarded to WG22 for preparation of a Disposition of Comments Report and a recommendation on the further processing of the PDAM. _________________end of summary page; beginning of detailed summary ____ ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22 LETTER BALLOT SUMMARY PROJECT NO: JTC1.22.47.3 SUBJECT: Proposed Draft Amendment 1: Fine-Grain Object Extensions to ISO/IEC 13719-1, Information Technology - Portable Common Tool Environment (PCTE), Part 1: Abstract Specification Reference Document No: N2059, N2175 Ballot Document No: N2175 Circulation Date: 07-08-1996 Closing Date: 10-21-1996 Circulated To: SC22 P, L Circulated By: Secretariat SUMMARY OF VOTING AND COMMENTS RECEIVED Approve Disapprove Abstain Comments Not Voting 'P' Members Australia (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Austria ( ) ( ) (X) (X) ( ) Belgium ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Brazil (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Canada (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) China ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Czech Republic (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Denmark (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Egypt (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Finland (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) France ( ) ( ) (X) (X) ( ) Germany ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) ( ) Japan (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Netherlands ( ) ( ) (X) (X) ( ) Romania ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Slovenia (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Sweden ( ) ( ) (X) (X) ( ) Switzerland (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) UK (X) ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) Ukraine (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) USA ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) ( ) 'O' Members Argentina ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Bulgaria ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Cuba ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Greece ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Hungary ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Iceland ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) India ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Indonesia ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Italy ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Korea Rep ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) New Zealand ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Norway ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Poland ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Portugal ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Russian fed ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Singapore ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Thailand ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Turkey ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Yugoslavia ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ___________________end of detailed summary; beginning of comments ________ Technical comments to accompany UK approval vote to PDAM ballot for PDAM1 to ISO/IEC 13719-1 (SC22 N2175) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Clause F.4 (Concurrency and integrity control) does not make sufficiently clear the relation between locks on fine-grain objects and locks on their clusters. In particular: - Is the translation of a lock on a fine-grain object to one of the cluster transparent to the application? - probably yes. - Is a lock on a cluster equivalent to locks on all the fine-grain objects in the cluster? - presumably yes. - Can LOCK_SET_OBJECT and LOCK_UNSET_OBJECT be used on fine-grain objects? - presumably yes. - If 2 locks are acquired to different fine-grain objects in a cluster via LOCK_SET_OBJECT and the first is then released via LOCK_UNSET_OBJECT, does the second still hold or not? - presumably not. N.B. this does not affect the corresponding PDAMs to the other 2 parts of ISO/IEC 13719 so the UK response to those PDAM ballots (SC22 N2176, N2177) should be approval without comment. ________________________________end of document SC22 N2326 ___________