From listadm Thu Jan 17 21:14:11 2002 Received: from email1.ansi.org (email1.ansi.org [12.15.192.17]) by dkuug.dk (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id VAA25635 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 21:14:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mdeane@ANSI.org) Received: by email1.ansi.org with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 15:14:37 -0500 Message-ID: <2F81C8110D55D411882A0020356797B20110AF9C@email1.ansi.org> From: Matthew Deane To: "'SC 22 Distribution List'" Subject: SC 22 N3365 - Summary of Voting on SC 22 N 3330, Letter Ballot on Revision of ISO/IEC TR 10176 - Guidelines for the Preparation of Program ming Language Standards Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 15:14:36 -0500 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 Programming languages, their environments and system software interfaces Secretariat: U.S.A. (ANSI) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 N3365 TITLE: Summary of Voting on SC 22 N 3330, Letter Ballot on Revision of ISO/IEC TR 10176 - Guidelines for the Preparation of Programming Language Standards DATE ASSIGNED: 2002-01-17 SOURCE: SC 22 Secretariat BACKWARD POINTER: N/A DOCUMENT TYPE: Meeting Announcement PROJECT NUMBER: 1.22.13 STATUS: Per the results of this ballot, Kona Resolution 01-22 is approved. The results of this ballot are forwarded to SC 22/WG 20 for preparation of the appropriate NWI proposal. ACTION IDENTIFIER: ACT DUE DATE: DISTRIBUTION: Text CROSS REFERENCE: SC 22 N3330 DISTRIBUTION FORM: Def Address reply to: ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 Secretariat Matt Deane ANSI 25 West 43rd Street New York, NY 10036 Telephone: (212) 642-4992 Fax: (212) 840-2298 Email: mdeane@ansi.org ___end cover page, beginning of summary of voting________ SUMMARY OF VOTING ON Letter Ballot Reference No: SC22 N3330 Circulated by: JTC 1/SC22 Circulation Date: 2001-10-05 Closing Date: 2002-01-07 SUBJECT: Summary of Voting on SC 22 N 3330, Letter Ballot on Revision of ISO/IEC TR 10176 - Guidelines for the Preparation of Programming Language Standards ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The following responses have been received on the subject of revision: "P" Members supporting the revision of this project 11 (Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Japan, Norway, Republic of Korea, Romania, Russian Federation, UK, USA) "P" Members supporting the revision of this project with comments - "P" Members not supporting the revision of this project 1 (Netherlands) "P" Members abstaining 1 (France) "P" Members not voting 10 (Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Egypt, Ireland, DPR of Korea, Slovenia, Ukraine) Note: O-member Sweden supports revision. ___________ end of summary, beginning on NB comments _____________ Netherlands No, we would like to make a proposal that there will be an intarisation at the plenary meeting, if there is a need for this revision.