Subject: SC 22 N3362 - Letter Ballot on Withdrawal of Project JTC 1.22.154 35 - APIs for Internationalization

From: Matthew Deane <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 15:39:11 -0500

ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22
Programming languages, their environments and system software interfaces
Secretariat:  U.S.A.  (ANSI)
 
ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 N3362
 
TITLE:
Summary of Voting on SC 22 N 3328, Letter Ballot on Withdrawal of Project
JTC 1.22.15435 - APIs for Internationalization

DATE ASSIGNED:
2002-01-14
 
SOURCE:
SC 22 Secretariat

BACKWARD POINTER:
N/A
 
DOCUMENT TYPE:
Summary of Voting

PROJECT NUMBER:
N/A
 
STATUS:
Per the results of this ballot, the request contained in Kona Resolution
01-26 will be sent to JTC 1 for approval.

ACTION IDENTIFIER:
ACT
 
DUE DATE:
  
DISTRIBUTION:
Text

CROSS REFERENCE:
SC 22 N3328

DISTRIBUTION FORM:
Def
 
Address reply to:
ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 Secretariat
Matt Deane
ANSI
25 West 43rd Street
New York, NY  10036
Telephone:  (212) 642-4992
Fax:             (212) 840-2298
Email:  [email-masked]

______end of cover page, beginning of summary of voting__________________

SUMMARY OF VOTING ON

Letter Ballot Reference No:  SC22 N3328
Circulated by:               JTC 1/SC22
Circulation Date:            2001-10-05
Closing Date:                2002-01-07

SUBJECT:  Summary of Voting on SC 22 N 3328, Letter Ballot on Withdrawal of
Project JTC 1.22.15435 - APIs for Internationalization
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The following responses have been received on the subject of approval:

"P" Members supporting withdrawal request being sent to JTC 1 for approval

10 (Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Ireland, Japan, Netherlands, Republic
of Korea, Russian Federation, UK, USA)

"P" Members supporting withdrawal request being sent to JTC 1 for approval,
with comments

1 (Finland)        

"P" Members not supporting withdrawal request being sent to JTC 1 for
approval

1 (Norway)

"P" Members abstaining                    

1 (France)

"P" Members not voting                    

10 (Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Egypt, DPR of Korea, Romania,
Slovenia, Ukraine)

Note:  O-member Sweden voted to support withdrawal with the following
comment:  "Withdraw but make sure that a new work item on this subject is
started again as soon as possible."

___________ end of summary, beginning on NB comments _____________

Finland
"Any new NP would require more active industrial participation"

Norway
Norway vote NO; The standard is important and should be continued in some
way