From alb@sct.gouv.qc.ca Wed Jul 31 21:21:29 1996 Received: from socrate.riq.qc.ca (socrate.riq.qc.ca [199.84.128.1]) by dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id VAA08387 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 1996 21:21:23 +0200 Received: from 506.sct.gouv.qc.ca (riq-44-141.riq.qc.ca) by socrate.riq.qc.ca (5.x/SMI-SVR4) id AA15819; Wed, 31 Jul 1996 15:20:39 -0400 Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1996 15:20:39 -0400 Message-Id: <9607311920.AA15819@socrate.riq.qc.ca> X-Sender: alb@mail.riq.qc.ca X-Mailer: Eudora Light pour Windows Version 1.5.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: mtopping@ansi.org (Marisa T. - ANSI - JTC1/SC18 Secretariat) From: "Alain LaBont/e'/" Subject: Comments on 10741-1:1995/DAM1 sent to me by mistake Cc: sc18wg9@dkuug.dk, brannon@isocs.iso.ch (Keith B.) Marisa,=20 in trying to clean my big pile of snail mail, I found something that you sent me on June 5. This is identified on a pink memo (handwritten) as "Comments on ISO/IEC 10741-1:1995/DAM 1 from ISO ITTF". I am not the editor of this standard. I send a copy of this note to the SC18WG9 list and to ITTF, just in case somebody would be looking for it. I can fax it to the person concerned asap, if necessary. You also attached the same kind of document to the one you identified (not announced, though, by your pink memo) on the DAM 1 to 9995-7. Then I am involved, of course. What do I need to do with ITTF comments concerning me? Say that I agree on presentation (these are only publishing presentation comments)? Btw they did not use the version produced in Hamamatsu after the resolution of comments was produced. That is more serious. The version you had sent them as a hard copy is a good one, and the electronic copy I sent a few days ago in RTF format is the almost correct version (it must be corrected manually for 3 characters, based on the hard copy; this is indicated clearly at the beginning of the electronic document). Regards. Alain LaBont=E9 Qu=E9bec