From shl@hogpa.ho.att.com  Mon Jul 29 23:37:52 1996
Received: from cbgw1.att.com (cbgw1.att.com [192.20.239.133]) by dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id XAA12558 for <sc18wg9@dkuug.dk>; Mon, 29 Jul 1996 23:37:51 +0200
Received: from hogpa.ho.att.com by cbig1.att.att.com (SMI-8.6/EMS-1.2 sol2)
	id RAA17539; Mon, 29 Jul 1996 17:32:43 -0400
Received: from hogpd by hogpa.ho.att.com (5.0/EMS-1.2 sol2)
	id AA19052; Mon, 29 Jul 1996 17:37:35 -0400
Received: by hogpd (4.1/EMS-1.1 SunOS)
	id AA23202; Mon, 29 Jul 96 17:37:34 EDT
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 96 17:37:34 EDT
Message-Id: <9607292137.AA23202@hogpd>
From: shl@hogpa.ho.att.com (Steven H Lewis)
To: "Alain LaBont/e'/" <alb@sct.gouv.qc.ca>,
        MARISA TOPPING <MTOPPING@ansi.org>
Cc: brannon@isocs.iso.ch (Keith B.), sc18wg9@dkuug.dk
Subject: Re: (SC18WG9.9) Amendment 1 to ISO/IEC 9995-7

Much of what comes across this list is of general interest and thus 
appropriate to a reflector, but some is not.  Alain, if what you 
want is to make sure the WG9 and SC18 secretariats get a copy of 
your RTF files, why not send them just to them?

(just a grumpy grey monday here)

steve lewis
