From owner-sc35wg4+sc35wg4-domo=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Fri Mar  9 05:13:53 2012
Return-Path: <owner-sc35wg4+sc35wg4-domo=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc35wg4-domo
Delivered-To: sc35wg4-domo@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 1746735698C; Fri,  9 Mar 2012 05:13:53 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: sc35wg4@open-std.org
Received: from rap.rap.dk (0x5551165b.adsl.cybercity.dk [85.81.22.91])
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A835E356687
	for <sc35wg4@open-std.org>; Fri,  9 Mar 2012 05:13:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: by rap.rap.dk (Postfix, from userid 500)
	id 3E23E27DE; Fri,  9 Mar 2012 05:13:51 +0100 (CET)
X-Greylist: delayed 4310 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at www5.open-std.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 01:49:28 CET
Received: from venus2.jsa.or.jp (venus2.jsa.or.jp [61.117.214.198])
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B05E35696F;
	Fri,  9 Mar 2012 01:49:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: from gemini-d2.net.jsa.or.jp ([172.16.1.29]) by venus2.jsa.or.jp
          (Post.Office MTA v4.0.1.1 release 20070724
           ID# 5002-024U600L600S0V40J) with ESMTP id jp;
          Fri, 9 Mar 2012 08:37:34 +0900
Received: from Perseus3.jsa.or.jp (perseus.jsa.or.jp) by gemini-d2.net.jsa.or.jp
 (Clearswift SMTPRS 5.2.9) with ESMTP id <Ta30302e0000a00000311d4@gemini-d2.net.jsa.or.jp>;
 Fri, 9 Mar 2012 08:36:29 +0900
X-AuditID: ac100110-b7c25ae000001edb-28-4f5942be456e
Received: from 0804A008CA (planet.jsa.or.jp [172.16.1.1])
	by Perseus3.jsa.or.jp (Symantec Brightmail Gateway) with SMTP id 16.54.07899.EB2495F4; Fri,  9 Mar 2012 08:37:34 +0900 (JST)
From: "Hiroaki Ikeda" <ikeda@jsa.or.jp>
To: "'Andy Heath'" <andyheath@axelrod.plus.com>
Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?'Alain_LaBont=E9'?= <alabon@gmail.com>,
	<sc35wg4@open-std.org>,
	<jaeil@nia.or.kr>,
	<sc35wg1@open-std.org>
References: <20120229034257.97BBD9DB114@www.open-std.org> <20120306155520.76861356945@www.open-std.org> <20120306220605.23A7F356941@www.open-std.org> <4F56BDDB.1060706@axelrod.plus.com> <20120307124800.20BBA356945@www.open-std.org> <20120307181203.148263569A2@www.open-std.org> <20120308221932.D342B3569A2@www.open-std.org>
Subject: RE: (SC35WG1.330) (SC35WG4.14) WD 17549 (4-direction devices) English Question
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 08:37:29 +0900
Message-ID: <94368F45BD624E59B6E8DBA8F1F48E3F@net.jsa.or.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
Thread-Index: Acz9eY+pRIoPHvkBTGihw9cVoO8XYgAClygg
In-Reply-To: <20120308221932.D342B3569A2@www.open-std.org>
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Sender: owner-sc35wg4@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

Dear Andy,

Thank you very much for your efforts of improving English.

Please kindky review the Annex A for English improving.
Tomorrow I will meet the co-editor over the Skype for further overall
action.

With best regards,
Hiroaki IKEDA

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sc35wg1@open-std.org [mailto:owner-sc35wg1@open-std.org] On
Behalf Of Andy Heath
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 7:19 AM
To: Andy Heath
Cc: Alain LaBont=E9; sc35wg4@open-std.org; jaeil@nia.or.kr;
sc35wg1@open-std.org
Subject: (SC35WG1.330) (SC35WG4.14) WD 17549 (4-direction devices) =
English
Question

Dear Professor Ikeda,

does the Annex. A. need reviewing for English "improving" ?
Or should this be left alone as a document from an external source ?

Kind regards

andy

> In the attached I've reviewed the english as requested and made=20
> extensive editorial modifications and comments. Almost all of the=20
> modifications are entirely editorial with just the odd one or two=20
> where I've suggested a small semantic change.
>
> In many cases I wasn't clear what was intended and so I commented to=20
> that effect and in some cases suggested several alternatives from=20
> which one can be selected. In some places I could make no sense at all =

> of a few sentences so there was nothing I could do with it - in those=20
> cases I'm happy to review again and supply english text if some=20
> clarification of meaning can be made and the document marked up in=20
> some way so I can find them.
>
> I haven't yet tackled Annex A because I'm not sure of its context and=20
> whether its ok to modify it - if its text taken from some external=20
> study then is it ok to make modifications ?
>
> I hope this helps and am happy to look again at clarified parts=20
> identified to need a further look and also the Annex if its =
appropriate.
>
> Cheers
>
> andy



Cheers

andy
--
__________________
Andy Heath
http://axelafa.com


