From owner-sc35wg4+sc35wg4-domo=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Thu Mar 8 23:19:32 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc35wg4-domo Delivered-To: sc35wg4-domo@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 2A37D35699F; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 23:19:32 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: sc35wg4@open-std.org Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C9F35693B; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 23:19:30 +0100 (CET) Received: by wgbfm10 with SMTP id fm10so829177wgb.22 for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 14:19:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IOZsvlQa9Z5l6MQUyDiTDCNdwFx9MZWIqdIirNKBQGs=; b=dm2Sn6c2DLi2H6L7O6PCDtpTVHZZLwcslpKTMhXEhIDERJeN16iAOjn7oK7dBgMLcG YYc/1lEO4vnpuRhptUSfvnb5Koz/UWhSCF9lHQbs4Bcq8n7RhIjJIKD0YVkrp5LeBObk yEAxZA9UnEeNOvSm5RAs5Tuh4mCj9FU2TlCjbJHvnfHBV3maQRzDCYKlkAxYyWvHrJiA Nl2vmGWfyNVGC+TDPuCxgzR0CvLeJbn/2D/hLd+H5z6QA/5ZfX8okq3LpqRms2E9bDWF 3h3V7Jdxk0cIjrcOmGpQQDpEw3fjMw9lK6OtwBtFNrQ17WM89LL0k567qRbrEbgz/ob6 at9Q== Received: by 10.180.85.35 with SMTP id e3mr38698534wiz.6.1331245170119; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 14:19:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from andysmacbook.localdomain (axelrod.plus.com. [81.174.245.58]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p10sm858617wic.0.2012.03.08.14.19.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 08 Mar 2012 14:19:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F59306E.7000900@axelrod.plus.com> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 22:19:26 +0000 From: Andy Heath User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andy Heath CC: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alain_LaBont=E9?= , sc35wg4@open-std.org, jaeil@nia.or.kr, sc35wg1@open-std.org Subject: Re: (SC35WG4.14) (SC35WG1.326) WD 17549 (4-direction devices) English Question References: <20120229034257.97BBD9DB114@www.open-std.org> <20120306155520.76861356945@www.open-std.org> <20120306220605.23A7F356941@www.open-std.org> <4F56BDDB.1060706@axelrod.plus.com> <20120307124800.20BBA356945@www.open-std.org> <20120307181203.148263569A2@www.open-std.org> In-Reply-To: <20120307181203.148263569A2@www.open-std.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sc35wg4@open-std.org Precedence: bulk Dear Professor Ikeda, does the Annex. A. need reviewing for English "improving" ? Or should this be left alone as a document from an external source ? Kind regards andy > In the attached I've reviewed the english as requested and made > extensive editorial modifications and comments. Almost all of the > modifications are entirely editorial with just the odd one or two where > I've suggested a small semantic change. > > In many cases I wasn't clear what was intended and so I commented to > that effect and in some cases suggested several alternatives from which > one can be selected. In some places I could make no sense at all of a > few sentences so there was nothing I could do with it - in those cases > I'm happy to review again and supply english text if some clarification > of meaning can be made and the document marked up in some way so I can > find them. > > I haven't yet tackled Annex A because I'm not sure of its context and > whether its ok to modify it - if its text taken from some external study > then is it ok to make modifications ? > > I hope this helps and am happy to look again at clarified parts > identified to need a further look and also the Annex if its appropriate. > > Cheers > > andy Cheers andy -- __________________ Andy Heath http://axelafa.com