From owner-sc35wg4+sc35wg4-domo=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Wed Mar 7 13:47:59 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc35wg4-domo Delivered-To: sc35wg4-domo@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 632E4356941; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 13:47:59 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: sc35wg4@open-std.org Received: from mail-vx0-f175.google.com (mail-vx0-f175.google.com [209.85.220.175]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E217356941; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 13:47:57 +0100 (CET) Received: by vcbfl13 with SMTP id fl13so7394640vcb.34 for ; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 04:47:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:x-mailer:date:to:from:subject:cc:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type; bh=EaxUXJz5ueYOKC8kJ1mYSo+KixRXXwFhQx66OkTNFF0=; b=PNSIWCMi+zJJCTQvCZ/HnI8ypRDBLL0odj1ELRIfTekXdN9zWQw/jzoGxSdhYeknx2 41GVPTxufwPTrsrMzKM97VI57NZ8rlaa8iNBJ62I+poiMud0wRN1/jZ9cuR5P3Ow9vcP m6W5bNJeeJtWQJDcmhbmxACfnO+saKe6nt+czqI76WtbQDmN+4BPPLBQxT1R3XGLG7ur LFxPdFTp75o26NUeBg510e1dUcXEQenmvka9PLnxY0XLF2Ws2G0rQJ4CapInAU8XLviQ 43lMx1/nuj7fnW0UwdnIwZmyxA8aeizNyZMiJ0PS+D0yb0FfVe08uPE5UttAb6v8VBCZ ebsw== Received: by 10.52.71.80 with SMTP id s16mr2610770vdu.131.1331124476330; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 04:47:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from Osiris.gmail.com (modemcable087.250-177-173.mc.videotron.ca. [173.177.250.87]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n14sm36270721vdj.22.2012.03.07.04.47.54 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 07 Mar 2012 04:47:54 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <7.0.1.0.2.20120307074504.065ed1b8@gmail.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 07:47:51 -0500 To: sc35wg4@open-std.org From: Alain LaBonté Subject: Re: (SC35WG1.326) (SC35WG4.10) Reviced WD 17549 (4-direction devices) Cc: jaeil@nia.or.kr,sc35wg1@open-std.org In-Reply-To: <4F56BDDB.1060706@axelrod.plus.com> References: <20120229034257.97BBD9DB114@www.open-std.org> <20120306155520.76861356945@www.open-std.org> <20120306220605.23A7F356941@www.open-std.org> <4F56BDDB.1060706@axelrod.plus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====================_411721785==.ALT" Sender: owner-sc35wg4@open-std.org Precedence: bulk --=====================_411721785==.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Le 2012-03-06 à 20:46, Andy Heath a écrit: [...] >>[Alain] 4. Methods for navigation and selection within menus with >> 4-direction devices. >> >>I think the relationship between words would not totally be clear for me >>unless we simplify. >> >>Is it really useful to say "guidelines on [...] methods"? The word >>"methods" by itself is simple enough and is already stronger and more >>meaningful than guidelines on methods. > >[Andy] I prefer your suggestion Alain (number 4) to the three >suggestions I made - it is simpler and cleaner. [Alain] Thanks. Let's wait for a confirmation by the editor(s) that this is really what is meant though. That was my understanding, but I always keep a doubt ! Alain --=====================_411721785==.ALT Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Le 2012-03-06 à 20:46, Andy Heath a écrit:
[...]

[Alain] 4. Methods for navigation and selection within menus with
4-direction devices.

I think the relationship between words would not totally be clear for me
unless we simplify.

Is it really useful to say "guidelines on [...] methods"? The word
"methods" by itself is simple enough and is already stronger and more
meaningful than guidelines on methods.

[Andy] I prefer your suggestion Alain (number 4) to the three suggestions I made - it is simpler and cleaner.

[Alain] Thanks. Let's wait for a confirmation by the editor(s) that this is really what is meant though. That was my understanding, but I always keep a doubt !

Alain --=====================_411721785==.ALT--