From owner-sc35wg4+sc35wg4-domo=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Wed Mar  7 02:46:08 2012
Return-Path: <owner-sc35wg4+sc35wg4-domo=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc35wg4-domo
Delivered-To: sc35wg4-domo@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id BF032356941; Wed,  7 Mar 2012 02:46:08 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: sc35wg4@open-std.org
Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53])
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F52C356941;
	Wed,  7 Mar 2012 02:46:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: by wgbfm10 with SMTP id fm10so3376741wgb.22
        for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 17:46:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
        h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
         :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=/CPgEBbiqJOR5alM0Xu045D/3bbqQiaSG740SN6W9uw=;
        b=czM1GN/ObLK/wUkPj34oLwgjJ0JKxv2C8FAoyXEBOfp87zc4KHWYGu7al5K4YbFU6h
         8ndFosZ3JQu8lDQ8w8rYjF8EhTYhCKi6S7NddfhaWXMEjo4HHfjao8q4cVpg+u+z1WA5
         p4zvHm/hGK2MIB7psUZg4b/Dlc143I42j2loG7oXBc77NrZbVQJnwPCffLLBhOHIzcVY
         qLbjGmgS2QoflxcxmUf+7YSg+mFqFZLIIoixIQD3Lqy8DdR49ldtm5/BnEYA93WdSJLE
         lSC2wfcgV+tafj0YVZ7F8KbmAUIQNG8wOvTQb254iR9ZqbSmCNq142lpKBgdRaGB9xe1
         bYZg==
Received: by 10.180.100.228 with SMTP id fb4mr414973wib.1.1331084767194;
        Tue, 06 Mar 2012 17:46:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from andysmacbook.localdomain (axelrod.plus.com. [81.174.245.58])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k6sm32312630wiy.7.2012.03.06.17.46.04
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 06 Mar 2012 17:46:05 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4F56BDDB.1060706@axelrod.plus.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 01:46:03 +0000
From: Andy Heath <andyheath@axelrod.plus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alain_LaBont=E9?= <alabon@gmail.com>
CC: sc35wg4@open-std.org, jaeil@nia.or.kr, sc35wg1@open-std.org
Subject: Re: (SC35WG1.326) (SC35WG4.10) Reviced WD 17549 (4-direction devices)
References: <20120229034257.97BBD9DB114@www.open-std.org> <20120306155520.76861356945@www.open-std.org> <20120306220605.23A7F356941@www.open-std.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120306220605.23A7F356941@www.open-std.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-sc35wg4@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

Alain et. al.,

<snipped discussion of 3 possible titles - see previous email>

> [Alain] We could also say (better understanding of what it is ?) :
>
>     4. Methods for navigation and selection within menus with
>     4-direction devices.
>
> I think the relationship between words would not totally be clear for me
> unless we simplify.
>
> Is it really useful to say "guidelines on [...] methods"? The word
> "methods" by itself is simple enough and is already stronger and more
> meaningful than guidelines on methods.

I prefer your suggestion Alain (number 4) to the three suggestions I 
made - it is simpler and cleaner.

andy
>
> Alain
>
> Alain



Cheers

andy
-- 
__________________
Andy Heath
http://axelafa.com